Author Topic: Should the military intervene?  (Read 2137 times)

  • Offline Serious

  • Posts: 14,467
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
Re:Should the military intervene?
Reply #15 on: July 04, 2007, 19:55:53 PM
Quote from: Clockd 0Ne
I think the administration in this place sucks!


Sack the Mod then :P

  • Offline Pete

  • Posts: 5,155
  • Hero Member
Re:Should the military intervene?
Reply #16 on: October 20, 2007, 02:04:44 AM
Inhabitants have been extremely quiet since the tensions in SC eased. Somehow an unspoken pact of peace has developed and people are sticking largely to Waffle and Askjolene.

I ask ye, do up ye pants and come back to SC. The war is over and there are all kinds of topics waiting to be shouted about.

e.g.
* Iran. How is George going to justify the bombing runs?
* Grolsch. Light beverage or italic day-glow green marker in disguise?
* Gordon Brown: what a twat.
* Ginger: compulsory head-shavings or just a mandatory hair-dye treatment?
* George Lucas: Is it too late for proffesional intervention and medication?
I know sh*ts bad right now with all that starving bullsh*t and the dust storms and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings.

  • Offline Serious

  • Posts: 14,467
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
Re:Should the military intervene?
Reply #17 on: October 20, 2007, 17:43:59 PM
The threads that would normally end up here are being put in GD or even waffle. Seems the Moderating team are no longer capable of sorting them out any more.

/sings sack the board, sack the board, sack the board!

Re:Should the military intervene?
Reply #18 on: October 20, 2007, 17:59:00 PM
Gingers, Go big or all off.

Trying to get my mate to do his hair like sideshow bob.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.